Laboratory Phonology VII - download pdf or read online

By Conference in Laboratory Phonology 2000 (University of Nijmegen), Carlos Gussenhoven, Natasha Warner

ISBN-10: 3110170868

ISBN-13: 9783110170863

ISBN-10: 3110170876

ISBN-13: 9783110170870

This selection of papers in laboratory phonology methods phonological idea from numerous varied empirical instructions. Psycholinguistic learn into the conception and construction of speech has produced effects that problem present conceptions approximately phonological constitution. box paintings experiences supply clean insights into the constitution of phonological beneficial properties, and the phonology-phonetics interface is investigated in phonetic learn related to either segments and prosody, whereas the function of underspecification is placed to the try in computerized speech popularity.

Show description

Read or Download Laboratory Phonology VII PDF

Best nonfiction_3 books

Large-scale scientific computing, 7 conf., LSSC 2009, - download pdf or read online

This e-book constitutes the completely refereed post-conference complaints of the seventh overseas convention on Large-Scale clinical Computations, LSSC 2009, held in Sozopol, Bulgaria, in June 2009. The ninety three revised complete papers provided including five plenary and invited papers have been conscientiously reviewed and chosen from various submissions for inclusion within the e-book.

Additional info for Laboratory Phonology VII

Sample text

In W. U. Dressler, M. Prinzhorn & J. ), Proceedings of the 7th International Phonology Meeting, (pp. 217Ϫ232). Rosenberg and Sellier, Turin. Rhodes, R. A. 1996 English reduced vowels and the nature of natural processes. In B. Hurch & R. A. ), Natural Phonology: The State of the Art, (pp. 239Ϫ259). The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter. Roach, P. 1983 English Phonetics and Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Saffran, J. , Aslin, R. N. & Newport, E. L. 1996 Statistical cues in language acquisition: Word segmentation by infants.

Second, the determiner that (things of that nature) was more likely to have a full vowel than the complementizer or relative that. Both these differences, though, are clearly related to prosody; the pronoun that and the determiner that are both much more likely to receive accent than the complementizer or relative marker. The third result with that is less likely to be influenced by accent. The relativizer sense of that is shorter and has more coda deletion than the slightly less frequent complementizer sense of that.

Note that the lemma frequency 22 Daniel Jurafsky, Alan Bell and Cynthia Girand hypothesis predicts that partitives should be shorter and more reduced than complements and shorter and more reduced than genitives, which is the case. 001) remain significant. Finally, controlling also for predictability, we still found effects of lemma on coda deletion, but not on duration (F < 1). 3 These results suggest that surface pronunciations of the (more frequent) partitive lemma for of are more reduced than surface pronunciations of the (less frequent) complement or genitive lemmas.

Download PDF sample

Laboratory Phonology VII by Conference in Laboratory Phonology 2000 (University of Nijmegen), Carlos Gussenhoven, Natasha Warner


by Charles
4.1

Rated 4.06 of 5 – based on 39 votes