
By Lisa A. Reed
ISBN-10: 1614510423
ISBN-13: 9781614510420
Generative thought has lengthy sought to trap the syntax of keep an eye on, wondering even if the supplement clause includes a syntactically projected thematic topic, no matter if such a controversy undergoes displacement and, if that is so, the place and why, and what position semantics could play. This ebook keeps during this culture, significantly analyzing paradigms erroneously assumed to desire seasoned analyses over stream and implicit argument debts. It deals novel information amenable to research in simple terms inside a professional procedure - yet one extensively diverse from its predecessors in shape and interpretation.
Read Online or Download Strengthening the PRO Hypothesis PDF
Similar grammar books
The antidote to Eats, Shoots and Leaves—an uproarious and intensely American language ebook when you are bored with getting pulled over by means of the grammar police
What do suicidal pandas, doped-up rock stars, and a unadorned Pamela Anderson have in universal? They’re all a heck of much more fascinating than analyzing approximately predicate nominatives and hyphens. June Casagrande is familiar with this and has invented an entire new twist at the grammar e-book. Grammar Snobs Are nice vast Meanies is a laugh-out-loud humorous number of anecdotes and essays on grammar and punctuation, in addition to hilarious reviews of the self-appointed language specialists.
Chapters include:
• I’m scripting this whereas Naked—The Oh-So Steamy Predicate Nominative
• Semicolonoscopy—Colons, Semicolons, Dashes, and different Probing Annoyances
• I’ll Take "I suppose Like a Moron" for $200, Alex—When to place Punctuation inside of citation Marks
• Snobbery Up with that you aren't placed Up—Prepositions
• Is Dangler on your Memo or Are you simply comfortable to determine Me?
• Hyphens—Life-Sucking, Mom-and-Apple-Pie-Hating, Mime-Loving, Nerd- Fight-Inciting Daggers of the Damned
Casagrande gives you functional and enjoyable language classes now not stumbled on anyplace else, demystifying the topic and taking it again from the snobs. briefly, it’s a grammar booklet humans will truly are looking to read—just for the joys of it.
This quantity provides the 1st result of a long term learn undertaking, funded by means of the Italian govt, which goals at mapping out the high quality useful constitution of sentences, nominal words, and different significant words making up sentences. specifically, it examines the practical constitution of DPs (determiner words) and IPs (inflection phrases).
- The Grammar of Q: Q-Particles, Wh-Movement, and Pied-Piping (Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax)
- Functional Structure from Top to Toe: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 9
- The In-Situ Approach to Sluicing
- Spanish to Go: A Weekend's Worth of Essential Word's and Phrases
- Representation Theory (Current Studies in Linguistics)
Additional info for Strengthening the PRO Hypothesis
Example text
Following earlier work in Chomsky (1976: 331), Chomsky & Lasnik (1977: 432–433) assume that the [NP e] in Control structures like (44b) above is simply an NP associated neither with lexical material nor, they add, a referential index. Crucially, and in contrast to Jackendoff (1969), they assume that the very same type of unexpanded NP is found in the Deep Structure subject position of a passive sentence like (47a), which Chomsky & Lasnik associate with the Deep Structure in (47b): (47) a. Bill was hit.
I persuaded Mary [ S 0 [ S PRO to stay]]. Turning to the role of Case in this system, Chomsky (1981a, 1982) incorporates from Chomsky (1980) Jean-Roger Vergnaud’s Case Filter, formulated now as in (96). As before, this filter applies at PF, and only to NPs that are phonetically overt. In other words, PRO and trace “escape” its effects, although, also as before, nothing precludes PRO from being associated with Case if the appropriate set of circumstances should arise, a fact to which we will return at the end of this section.
9 See Chomsky (1980: 25) for the formal definition of government employed at that time. Approaches to Control in Transformational Grammar (1957–1981) 35 Turning to the “Rules of Control” in this theory, Chomsky (1980: 33) assumes that in the unmarked case, verbs selecting infinitival complement clauses are lexically associated with the feature [+Control], with Rosenbaum’s MDP now determining, for the most part, which NP will ultimately be selected as PRO’s antecedent. g. the verb promise, in which the MDP is not respected.
Strengthening the PRO Hypothesis by Lisa A. Reed
by David
4.3